Extended-release Trospium Chloride 60mg – A New Once-daily Medication for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome

European Urological Review, 2009;4(2):43-7

Abstract

Trospium chloride is an anticholinergic drug registered for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), with distinct molecular and pharmacological characteristics. As a quaternary amine, trospium chloride’s capacity to cross the blood–brain barrier is extremely limited, minimising its potential to cause central nervous system (CNS)-mediated side effects. The extent of metabolism is low and independent of the liver cytochrome P450 isoenzyme system, which further simplifies decision-making in polypharmacy situations, e.g. multimorbid and elderly patients. Subject to predominantly renal elimination as the unchanged form, trospium chloride retains its pharmacological activity within the urinary bladder, and local action on urothelium muscarinic receptors is purported to contribute to its early onset and sustained efficacy, particularly in controlling urgency symptoms. A novel modified-release form of trospium chloride enables once-daily administration, potentially enhancing therapy compliance and improving its clinical efficacy/tolerability profile compared with immediate-release forms.
Keywords
Overactive bladder, trospium chloride, urothelium, urinary incontinence
Disclosure Linda Cardozo has during the last year received funding for research, lecturing and/or advice/consultancy from the following organisations: Astellas (member of the Global Advisory Board for Solifenacin, Co-Chairman of the European Overactive Bladder Forum, Principal Investigator for the SUNRISE study, speaker at satellite symposia); Pfizer (member of Global Advisory Board for Fesoterodine, participant in a multicentre research study); Schering Plough (Gynaecological Advisory Board, research consultancy). She has also carried out advisory work for Astellas, Pfizer, Schering Plough, Allergan, Rottapharm and SPE Pharma. Vincenzo Mirone, Christian Gratzke and Michael Marberger are advisors to and speakers for Rottapharm.
Received: January 22, 2010 Accepted February 04, 2010
Correspondence: Linda Cardozo, Professor of Urogynaecology, King’s College Hospital, 8 Devonshire Place, London, W1G 6HP, UK. E: lcardozo@compuserve.com

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) has been defined by the International Continence Society (ICS) as a symptom complex diagnosed by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia.1 As assessed by the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study in several countries, the prevalence of OAB in randomly selected subjects of both sexes ≥18 years of age was similar in women and men, with rates of 12.8 and 10.8%, respectively.2 With increasing age, the prevalence increases significantly, reaching 16.6% in the overall population of subjects over 40 years of age.3 Such a common condition is associated with different degrees of impairment in quality of life (mostly when the symptoms are associated with urinary incontinence and sometimes depending on culture, environment, access to medical information and many other factors), with increased co-morbidity, particularly risk of falls and bone fractures in elderly people,4 and a heavy economic burden on the community.5,6


The pathophysiology of OAB is still not fully understood in view of its multifactorial nature, which involves sensory and motor components of the central nervous system (CNS), both the autonomic and somatic innervation of the detrusor muscle and internal urethral sphincter as well as sensory afferents from the urothelium. The treatment of OAB usually includes patient education and non-pharmacological measures such as bladder training and pelvic floor exercises; however, pharmacological treatment with anticholinergic drugs is becoming the mainstay of OAB therapy, at least in adult patients. By blocking muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle, in presynaptic nerve terminals and possibly at sensory afferent nerve terminals within the urothelium,7,8 anticholinergic drugs are thought to reduce the involuntary detrusor contractions, thereby controlling the symptoms of OAB.


Five subtypes of muscarinic receptors, M1–M5, have been identified within the parasympathetic system, with M2 and M3 subtypes accounting for two-thirds and one-third, respectively, of the muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle. M3 receptors mediate smooth-muscle contraction, whereas M2 receptors may inhibit smooth-muscle relaxation mediated by β-adrenergic receptors, thus indirectly contributing to bladder contractions. Since an age-related decline in the subpopulation of M3 receptors has been observed in the human bladder, the resulting further increase in the relative percentage of M2 receptors in the detrusor muscle of elderly people may lead to speculation about their overall contribution to the micturition process.10


The use of muscarinic receptor antagonists is common in patients with OAB.11,12 As a result of the wide distribution of muscarinic receptors in the CNS and peripheral nervous system, there have been safety concerns with respect to the ability of these drugs to penetrate the CNS and therefore potentially impair the acetylcholine-mediated cognitive functions.13

References:
  1. Abrams P, et al., Neurourol Urodyn, 2002;21:167–78.
  2. Milsom I, Irwin DE, Eur Urol Suppl, 2007;6:4–6.
  3. Milsom I, et al., BJU International, 2001;87(9):760–76.
  4. Liberman JN, et al., Urology, 2001;57:1044–50.
  5. Tubaro A, Urology, 2004;64(6A):2–6.
  6. Wagner TH, Hu TW, Urology, 1998;51:355–61.
  7. Chapple CR, Urology, 2000;55(Suppl. 5A):33–46.
  8. Andersson KE, Yoshida M, Eur Urol, 2003;43:1–5.
  9. Hegde SS, Eglen RM, Life Sci, 1999;64(6–7):419–28.
  10. Mansfield KJ, et al., Br J Pharmacol, 2005;144:1089–99.
  11. Andersson KE, et al. In: Abrams P, et al. (eds), Incontinence Vol 2 Management, Health Publication, 2005:809–54.
  12. Abrams P, Andersson KE, BJU, 2007;100:987–1006.
  13. Kay GG, Granville LJ, Clin Ther, 2005;27(1):127–38.
  14. Zinner N, et al., J Urol, 2004;171(6):2311–15.
  15. Rudy D, et al., Urology, 2006;67:275–80.
  16. Staskin D, et al., J Urol, 2007;178:978–84.
  17. Dmochowski R, et al., Urology, 2008;71:449–54.
  18. Staskin DR, Urol Clin N Am, 2006;33:465–73.
  19. Geyer J, et al., Drug Metab Dispos, 2009;37(7):1371–4.
  20. Doroshyenko O, et al., Clin Pharmacokinetics, 2005;44(7):701–20.
  21. Staskin DR, Drugs Aging, 2005;22(12):1013–28.
  22. Staskin DR, Harnett MD, Current Urology Reports, 2004;5:423–6.
  23. Ückert S, et al., Arzneim Forsch/Drug Res, 1998;48(II)8:836–9.
  24. Ückert S, et al., Forsch/Drug Res, 2000;50(I)5:456–60.
  25. Napier C, Gupta P, Neurourol Urodyn, 2002;21:A444.
  26. Ikeda K, et al., Naunyn-Schmiedberg´s Arch Pharmacol, 2002;366;97–103.
  27. Braverman AS, Ruggieri MR, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2003;285:R701–3.
  28. Beckmann-Knopp S, et al., Pharmacol Toxicol, 1999;85:299–304.
  29. Schladitz-Keil G, et al., Drug Res, 1986;36(I)6:948–87.
  30. Sandage B, et al., Poster Presentation. ICS and IUGA Joint Meeting, Paris, 2004; abstract 584.
  31. Abrams P, et al., Br J Pharmacol, 2006;148:565–78.
  32. de Groat WC, Urology, 2004;64(6A):7–11.
  33. Hawthorn MH, et al., Br J Pharmacol, 2000;129:416–19.
  34. Andersson KE, Urology, 2002;59(5A):43–50.
  35. Birder LA, Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2005;289(3):489–95.
  36. Finney SM, et al., BJU, 2006;98:503–7.
  37. Andersson KE, Lancet Neurol, 2004;3:46–53.
  38. Fröhlich G, et al., Drug Res, 1998;48(I):486–91.
  39. Walter P, et al., Neurourol Urodyn, 1999;18:447–53.
  40. Kim YT, et al., BJU Int, 2006;97(2):400–403.
  41. Kim YT, et al., Urology, 2005;65:238–42.
  42. Yoshida M, et al., Urology, 2006;67(2):425–30.
  43. Yoshida M, et al., J Pharmacol Sci, 2008;106:193–8.
  44. Daly DM, et al., Eur Urol, 2010; in press.
  45. Staskin DR, Cardozo L, Int J Clin Pract, 2009;63(6):973–6.
  46. Sand PK, et al., Int Urogynaecol J Pelvic Floor Disfunct, 2009 August 29 (Epub ahead of print).
  47. Dmochowski RD, et al., Value Health, 2009;9:1098–3015.
  48. Staskin DR, et al., Int J Clin Pract, 2009;63(12):1715–23